Editors should actively seek the views of the editorial board members, associate editors, authors,
reviewers and readers to find ways of improving the journal's content.
Editors are expected to take the initiative and educate the authors, researchers and young scholars
about the publishing ethics and policies.
Editors can review the submitted manuscripts according to their feasible time, if time does not
permit reviewing the manuscript fully, editors can suggest other reviewers to take it forward.
When an individual is specifically used in any of the research works, the editors must request a
copy of the written consent of the individual to qualify for the publishing of the research paper.
Basing on the subject of the research the editor must assign a reviewer for the research paper for
the peer review process.
The final decision of acceptance or rejection of the article/research paper should be taken by the
editor and the same is to be conveyed to the author the the editor.
If requested/ needed the submission can be sent to undergo another round of review, the authors
are to be asked too resubmit the article for re-reviewing process. The editor will receive e the
article again after the second round of review along with the recommendations and comments.
After the review process, the authors should be notified to view and respond to the reviewer
comments and suggestions.
Editors are expected to constructive and detailed review by which the author can get utmost help.
The thorough report is to be provided up front at once.
To keep the editing process efficient the editor is to be in touch with both reviewer and the author
to ensure coordination between the three and smooth running of the process.
